Digital photo printing, which allows users to print out photos without leaving their devices, has been embraced by many as a way to improve photos taken on the go.
However, a study published in the Journal of Social and Consumer Psychology, by researchers at the University of Western Australia and the University for Science and Technology in China, suggests that it is not an artform that pays off.
Researchers from the University’s Department of Computer Science, Design and Management found that photos taken using digital photo printers (DPPs) were significantly more likely to be lost, destroyed, or lost entirely after being printed on paper, compared to photos taken with traditional film or digital cameras.
The researchers conducted the study using a large number of images taken with DPPs over a five-month period, and found that images printed with DPGs were significantly less likely to retain their original shape than images printed without the device.
“The main challenge of digital photo processing is that it can be very time consuming and it can require a lot of ink to process, which is something we found with DPs,” Professor David McBride, the lead author of the study, told the ABC.
This is because it takes time to produce images with sufficient resolution to print on a printer, but there are no limitations on the size of the images that can be printed.
It’s a relatively small print size, but this is a huge advantage over a traditional camera, Professor McBride said.
DPP devices can also print images using a special ink that is a fraction of the size as ink that can go into a digital camera, but still requires more ink to print than it does to print a normal digital image.
“So DPs are a very useful technology to help people take more photos, because they can print images in a way that is faster, but also in a manner that’s safe,” he said.
“I think they’re a great alternative to digital cameras and they’re very much like cameras when it comes to the quality and resolution.”
The researchers also found that people who took the photographs with DPA’s were also more likely than others to report feeling satisfied with the quality of the photo, which may be a reflection of the higher level of confidence in the images themselves.
“When we looked at what people were saying about the quality they were getting out of the photographs, there was quite a wide range of comments that were positive, and quite a small range of negative comments,” Professor McBrien said.”[We also found] that people tended to think that DPP photos were generally good quality, but they were also a little bit less good quality than a traditional digital camera.”
Professor McBride’s study also found some other significant differences in how the photographs were printed.
“One thing that is really interesting is that when you look at a DPP image, you can really tell that it was produced in a very controlled environment.”
This means that there is no hand-eye coordination, there is not any way to control the amount of ink in the ink that you use, which makes the images quite accurate,” he explained.”
In digital photography, people tend to think there’s a lot more control because there is a lot less of a hand-to-eye movement.
“It’s very hard to capture the human eye with a camera, and it’s hard to control that, so you really have to think about the level of control that you have in the camera.”
Researchers believe that DPA may be less suitable for use in everyday settings than digital cameras, which are often used in creative and social settings.
Professor McBrien believes that this is due to the fact that DPG devices are designed to be used in more creative environments, rather than the traditional workplace, where people tend not to be able to rely on a human being to keep an eye on them during a long shoot.
“For many people, a DPG camera is going to be an ideal solution for the everyday life they want to capture.
For others, the DPG is not going to work out for them, they don’t want to be constantly checking the camera, they want the human presence,” he told the BBC.
If you’re in the market for a new digital camera and you’re looking for a great camera for your photography needs, then Professor McBrien recommends the Sony RX100.
Topics:photography,art-history,education,social-sciences,electronic-media,technology,human-interest,human,science-and-technology,computer-science,technology-and/or-technology-facilities,research,science,law,york-institute-of-technologyContact David McBrienMore stories from New South Wales